County Opens Door for 180-Home Fowler Development After Williamson Act Vote

The Fresno County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously Aug. 24 to cancel an agricultural protection contract on nearly 40 acres near Fowler, clearing the path for a 180-home subdivision by Crown Homes.

The board approved cancellation of Agricultural Land Conservation Contract No. 8271 for property at the southwest corner of South Sunnyside and East Sumner avenues. The Williamson Act contract had locked the parcel into agricultural use with a 20-acre minimum parcel size — making residential development impossible without the county’s approval to cancel it.

Property owner Joseph Crown, who serves as president of Fresno-based Crown Homes, will pay a $477,250 cancellation fee before the land can be annexed into the city of Fowler. The Fowler City Council approved the tentative tract map and annexation Feb. 3, pending this county action.

Advertisement

The board offered no comment on the item before approving it.

The project would include 180 single-family homes starting at around $380,000, plus about 1.9 acres of parkland and 1.1 acres of trail alignment. Proposed lot sizes range from 5,000 to 12,881 square feet.

The Fowler City Council most recently discussed the project during its Aug. 18 meeting, when the council rejected a general plan land use amendment and directed staff to rework the proposal to be more consistent with the city’s general plan. Under the initial proposal, the parcel would have been designated as medium-low density residential with around 180 units, but after the council’s decision to keep the parcel at low density residential, the final number could be reduced by around 39 units.

The Breakdown

• County staff had to make five findings to cancel the Williamson Act contract, including that the development would create a contiguous urban pattern and that no similarly sized, non-contracted parcels within Fowler’s sphere of influence were available for the proposed use.
• Staff determined all five findings could be made because the parcels surrounding the proposed development are already not in agricultural use or in agricultural use not subject to a Williamson Act contract, and since no suitable parcels were available for sale.
• Fresno County’s General Plan designates the property for agricultural use, while Fowler’s General Plan designates it for medium-low-density residential development.
• With the Williamson Act contract previously preventing the Fowler City Council from taking action on the tentative subdivision map, cancellation of the contract will now allow the council to do so when the time comes.

What This Means for You

The Board of Supervisors’ vote is the county-level approval that makes this development legally possible — without it, the land stays farmland by contract, and Fowler’s own approval of the project back in February couldn’t move forward. This isn’t the final step (Fowler’s council still has to act on the revised subdivision map), but it’s the gate the county controls.

For voters weighing how the Board of Supervisors handles growth decisions at the county’s edges, this is a example of how those votes work in practice: the board unanimously approved removing the agricultural protection and made no public comment on whether the tradeoff — nearly 40 acres of farmland for 180 homes — served the county’s long-term interests or just cleared an obstacle for the city next door.

What to Watch

The Fowler City Council rejected the developer’s initial density proposal Aug. 18 and sent it back for a rewrite — the final unit count could drop by 39 homes, which would change the project’s per-unit economics and possibly the affordability of the homes themselves. Whether Crown Homes absorbs that reduction or pushes back is worth watching, because it will show how much leverage the city actually has once the county’s already cleared the main hurdle.

The $477,250 cancellation fee is paid by the property owner, not the public — but the question the board didn’t discuss is what Fresno County itself is giving up by converting nearly 40 acres of protected farmland into a subdivision whose property taxes and services will belong to Fowler, not the county. The surrounding parcels are already out of agricultural use, according to staff — but how much protected farmland near growing cities like Fowler is left, and whether the county has a actual policy on when to say no to these cancellations, isn’t answered by this vote.

The homes are projected to start at $380,000. For context, that’s new construction priced for buyers with steady income and down-payment savings — not for the families most squeezed by Fresno County’s housing costs. Whether a project like this eases the region’s broader affordability pressure or just adds inventory at the top of the market is a real question the vote itself doesn’t address.